All swastikas aside, I'll chime in here.
First off, I feel for Nicci because nearly all of my experience is in cash games, which means that my HU game has completely sucked for years simply because I never really needed to improve it. The only way I ever got decent was to play a ton of HU SNG's. It set my bankroll about three years, but it was worth it since I was giving so much money away by finishing 2nd in so many SNG's.
The only advice I would give is to adjust your aggression relative to your stack size (more = more, obviously) and to vary your bet sizing. If you seriously just randomize your opening bets in hands where you do decide to play, that will at least keep your opponent working instead of just grinding away at your stack. You won't gain any value doing that,
but it's not a bad strategy if you think that you're completely outclassed. If I had to play Phil Hellmuth heads-up, that's what I would do. I don't agree with the 'never fold the button' philosophy only because you just give away so much value by doing that unless you have like 90% of the chips and you just have to crush the other guy.
All of the normal stats kind of go out the window, so I wouldn't put a ton of stock in those either. A 3-bet % on a 9 player table has very little to do with a 3-bet % HU. I actually think that all of the new poker stats programs do a lot more harm than good since most people completely misinterpret the numbers. It would take me a long time to elaborate, but the stats should function like a candle in a dark room as opposed to a flood light. A lot of people improperly treat them like a flood light.













































































Reply With Quote
