THE HAND In Question lol

**NoAngel2u** · 10-23-2010, 12:05 PM

Batgirl, I appreciate your assessment very much.

There's math involved?

lmao j/k
The only math I used was perceived impending fatal reduction and hopeful accumulation. lol

Also, I didn't have issue with the comments, they just made it clear that folks didn't understand why I called, and my reasoning for calling was definitely not involved. lol

TyTy

**batgirl218** · 10-23-2010, 12:12 PM

No prob. It's what I dooos 'round here. Only reason Jen keeps me around.

**all4pearljam** · 10-24-2010, 03:22 PM

donkalicious again today...that is all

**NoAngel2u** · 10-24-2010, 03:24 PM

For some reason I knew you were going to show up here. Well because Jen wants more action I'm going to post another thread on the hand you are bitching about since I made my call for other reasons. So you can just come bitch at me over there about how unfair it was.

**all4pearljam** · 10-24-2010, 03:30 PM

There are absolutely ZERO justifiable reasons to make that call with 2 allins in front of you...unless you had 50%+ of the total chips in play, no sane person would agree with you.

**WinJStar** · 10-24-2010, 04:57 PM

Originally Posted by NoAngel2u

For some reason I knew you were going to show up here. Well because Jen wants more action I'm going to post another thread on the hand you are bitching about since I made my call for other reasons. So you can just come bitch at me over there about how unfair it was.

(Raises hand...) I want genuine poker analysis where we can learn. We are in fact a poker forum. No one benefits when people put their foot down and aren't open for discussion.