Nuclear Fallout

[billynomates]

Post #34 your best yet!

Not surprised you appreciate it- it's vacuous.

[motherfunky]

Yes it is, but shows signs of improvement! well done

[motherfunky]

[billynomates]

Yes it is, but shows signs of improvement! well done

Cripples get accustomed to patronising praise- don't bother.

[billynomates]

As for the images- put your hand against your ear for 15 mins (without phone) -the images will be similar.

[motherfunky]

Where did you get that idea, seriously I want to know what shit made up source of info you use? quack quack

Post a link or if it's easier give me a cryptic clue as to where you got that bullshit idea?

[skyguy2007]

Thermographic picks up differences in heat, it's that simple. In a controlled environment a hand on a face would make no difference, but if someone was standing in a colder environment, held their hand to their face, you would think they were full of cancer if basing information on heat. Besides, I thought these tools used in the medical community made no difference to you, and now you want to use it as your base of thought...go figure!

http://www.thermologyonline.org/patients_overview.htm

[NoAngel2u]

I apologise Beth, I probably have too much time on my hands and forget some people are so busy/lazy/ addicted to wikipedia they need everything served up on a plate. Either that or I've been using my mobile phone too much!

Kiss my super moon Geoff. lol

[motherfunky]

Although its been widely reported the fuckyoushima incident is now a level 7 (like Chernobyl) its reporting seems to have predictably been consigned to just a few column inches, how queer.

But even more queer is the virtual blackout over the EPAs new definition of safe levels of background (not internal) radioactive isotopes. hmmm since radiation is above the old safe levels why not raise the safe levels by a multiple of lets say 100,000, that way everything is still safe!! haha

Its pure Genius I tell ya.

Drinking water, for example, would have a huge increase in allowable public exposure to radioactivity, the group says, that would include:

A nearly 1000-fold increase in strontium-90

A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for iodine-131

An almost 25,000 rise for nickel-63

The new radiation guidance would also allow long-term cleanup standards thousands of times more lax than anything EPA has ever before accepted, permitting doses to the public that EPA itself estimates would cause a cancer in as much as every fourth person exposed, the group says.

[wubders]

the cockroaches are getting ready for their rise to the top!!