We just bombed Libya

[maverick35]

Old Mav realizes exactly Libya is no not exactly a Korea and so Viet Nam right RIGHT and so about the population of a small state in America hardly a serious military world wide threat thing right RIGHT whutever and so yeta the bombing has no not seemingly hurt Ghadhaifis loyalist forces right RIGHT and so old Mav is lucky they do no not take old Mav seriously and so old Mav needs a miracle sorry right... sorry old Mav

[maverick35]

Old Mav realizes exactly America the British French and so every body thinks they gota follow a certain pattern to their own advantage butt they beter hope old Mav no not geta the miracle old Mav needs before it is too late for old Mav right RIGHT and so they refuse to bomb certain areas that would have caused Ghadhaifi to give up butt that is no not gona stop old Mav and so old Mav expects such dirty yellow tactics from them and so luckily at 66 they think old Mav is over the hill and so ready to buy the farm and so they beter be right RIGHT and so cuz if they r wrong and so they may pay dearly for it right RIGHT and so old Mav is lucky they do no not take old Mav seriously and so old Mav needs a miracle sorry right... sorry old Mav

[curtinsea]

This is messed up. I don't care which side of the political spectrum you are on, this is outrageous. Certainly we have no right to just up and bomb to death Qadaffi.

Where the hell is our Nobel Peace Prize winning President in all of this? Is he giving tacit approval for the removal by military force a foreign leader? After all that going around the world apologizing . . .

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

Americans never seem to learn. Time for new leadership in the USA. Isn't there a REAL anti-war Democrat out there who would give the people a real choice?

Former National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," said the "command-and-control elements" are legitimate targets, but that NATO should heed the "narrative" they want to emerge from the conflict.

"The narrative we want to come out of this is that the Libyan people overthrew a dictator, not that we came in and toppled a despot. And that's the problem with going after command and control if it results in the death of Qaddafi, because what we really want him to do is for him to leave or to die at a Libyan hand, not an American hand," Hadley said.

Lindsey Graham -
"Obama administration officials repeatedly have said the NATO mission is to protect the Libyan people and that it is U.S. policy that Qaddafi should go. Those concurrent, but presumably separate, goals have frustrated lawmakers who say the U.S. military needs a clearer mandate.

Graham praised NATO for the apparent missile strike on Tripoli.

"This is the way to end this. Thousands of people are subject to dying the longer this takes. No one in the world is going to regret Qaddafi being replaced, however you do it," he said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...#ixzz1L8IoO400

[maverick35]

Old Mav realizes exactly at least Ghadhaifi learned the hard way that he is no not imune to NATO air strikes and so may be he may decide to call it quits rather than continue to lose family although he does seems to be a rather fanaticial Arab dictator who would rather die than give in to popular demands right RIGHT and so hard to tell whut May 2011 is gona be like in Libya and so Syria where Assad another fanaticial Arab dictator refuses to give in to any popular demands right RIGHT and so may be Israel should bomb him right RIGHT and so old Mav is lucky they do no not take old Mav seriously and so old Mav needs a miracle sorry right... sorry old Mav