...An undeniable fact: the Republican voters' distaste for the obvious nominee. He's famous, rich and handsome. He's a decent speaker and has performed well in nearly every debate. He's an experienced governor of a blue state, a job that came after rich private-sector experience. He is first in the queue, having run last time and given John McCain a good going. But the party simply does not want to nominate Mitt Romney.
....This isn't to knock Mr Romney, nor Republicans. I simply can't remember when a party was so unwilling to make the obvious choice, and even less so for Republicans, famous for getting in line behind the guy who's waited patiently for his shot.
Full article in The Economist(online)I still think Rick Perry might improve at some point. But if he doesn't, faute de mieux, the Republicans are going to get a nominee they don't seem to like nearly as much as he deserves. Can Obamacare and Mormonism alone explain this? Is it the weathervane problem? Whatever it is, as per Lexington's "useless strikers" column a few weeks ago, this is a very strange state of affairs for a normally disciplined party to find itself in against a weak incumbent. And it doesn't bode well for base enthusiasm should Mr Romney, in fact, become the nominee













































































Reply With Quote